Screening Rates#
[1]:
import pynucastro as pyna
Screening Implementations#
pynucastro currently has 4 screening implementations:
screen5
based on Wallace et al. [1982]potekhin_1998
based on Chabrier and Potekhin [1998]chugunov_2007
based on Chugunov et al. [2007]chugunov_2009
based on Chugunov and DeWitt [2009]
Each of these use various approximations to account for the influence of the plasma on screening the electric charge of the nuclei that are fusing.
Using Screening#
To compute the screening factor for a rate, we need to know the entire composition (since the electron number density matters) as well as the two nuclei involved in the reaction. There are two special types that store this information:
PlasmaState
: stores the aggregate information about the entire plasmaScreenFactors
: stores the information about the two nuclei
We create these objects separate before we call the screening routine since there are some computational expensive calculations here that don’t change with repeated calls.
Here we create a PlasmaState
that knows about the conditions where the screening is taking place and then we use that to compute the screening factor for a rate. The helper function make_plasma_state
can create the PlasmaState
object
[2]:
nuclei = [pyna.Nucleus("h1"),
pyna.Nucleus("he4"),
pyna.Nucleus("c12"),
pyna.Nucleus("o16"),
pyna.Nucleus("n14"),
pyna.Nucleus("ca40")]
comp = pyna.Composition(nuclei)
comp.set_solar_like()
dens = 1.e6
temp = 1.e8
plasma = pyna.make_plasma_state(temp, dens, comp.get_molar())
Now let’s get the \({}^{12}\mathrm{C}(\alpha,\gamma){}^{16}\mathrm{O}\) rate and compute the screening factor
[3]:
reaclib_library = pyna.ReacLibLibrary()
rfilter = pyna.RateFilter(reactants=["c12", "he4"], products=["o16"])
r = reaclib_library.filter(rfilter).get_rates()[0]
r
[3]:
C12 + He4 ⟶ O16 + 𝛾
For the rate, we need the ScreenFactor
[4]:
scn_fac = pyna.make_screen_factors(r.ion_screen[0], r.ion_screen[1])
Finally, we’ll select the Chugunov (2009) screening and compute the screening factor. All of the needed thermodynamic information is contained in the PlasmaState
and all of the needed reaction rate information is contained in the ScreenFactor
[5]:
from pynucastro.screening import chugunov_2009
[6]:
scn = chugunov_2009(plasma, scn_fac)
scn
[6]:
4.42076841169158
Screening Map#
For a RateCollection
or a network derived from it, there are a lot of rates that will need to be screened, and some might have the same nuclei that need to be screened. A “screening map” keeps track of all of the rates that need to be screened for the same set of reactants.
Some networks (like the aprox
networks in the literature) use the same screening factor for the forward and reverse rates. A RateCollection
takes a keyword argument symmetric_screening
that tells the network to use the same screening for forward and reverse. The screening map will then take this into account.
The screening map returns a list of ScreeningPair
objects which contain the pair of nuclei that need a screening factor computed as well as the list of all the rates that screening factor applies to.
Here’s an example: let’s build a helium and carbon burning network.
[7]:
mynet = reaclib_library.linking_nuclei(["p", "n", "he4", "c12", "o16",
"na23", "mg24", "ne20"])
pynet = pyna.PythonNetwork(libraries=[mynet])
/opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.11.10/x64/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pynucastro/networks/rate_collection.py:576: UserWarning: ReacLib neutron decay rate (<n_to_p_weak_wc12>) does not account for degeneracy at high densities. Consider using tabular rate from Langanke.
warnings.warn(msg)
From the RateCollection
, we can get the screening map (the list of ScreeningPair
objects)
[8]:
from pynucastro.screening import get_screening_map
screen_map = get_screening_map(pynet.get_rates(), symmetric_screening=pynet.symmetric_screening)
[9]:
for s in screen_map:
print(s)
screening for He4 + C12
rates:
C12 + He4 ⟶ O16 + 𝛾
screening for He4 + O16
rates:
O16 + He4 ⟶ Ne20 + 𝛾
screening for He4 + Ne20
rates:
Ne20 + He4 ⟶ Mg24 + 𝛾
Ne20 + He4 ⟶ p + Na23
Ne20 + He4 ⟶ C12 + C12
screening for p + Na23
rates:
Na23 + p ⟶ Mg24 + 𝛾
Na23 + p ⟶ He4 + Ne20
Na23 + p ⟶ C12 + C12
screening for C12 + C12
rates:
C12 + C12 ⟶ p + Na23
C12 + C12 ⟶ He4 + Ne20
screening for C12 + O16
rates:
O16 + C12 ⟶ He4 + Mg24
screening for He4 + Mg24
rates:
Mg24 + He4 ⟶ C12 + O16
screening for He4 + He4
rates:
He4 + He4 + He4 ⟶ C12 + 𝛾
screening for He4 + Be8
rates:
He4 + He4 + He4 ⟶ C12 + 𝛾
Here we see that the screening for some pairs of nuclei (like \(p + {}^{23}\mathrm{Na}\)) apply to several rates.
Screening and a Python Network#
When we write out the module that defines a python network, it contains all of the information needed to define the righthand side and Jacobian, if screening is not used. But the rhs
and jacobian
functions can take an optional argument that is the name of the screening function to use, and if this is provided, then the rates will be screened. Here we demonstrate this.
[10]:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from scipy.integrate import solve_ivp
[11]:
pynet.write_network("cburn.py")
import cburn
First we’ll run with screening. Here we pass the name of the screening function to the rhs
and jacobian
function through the args
keyword
We’ll pick conditions appropriate for the center of a Chandra mass white dwarf just after a carbon flame ignites.
[12]:
rho = 1.e9
T = 2.e9
X0 = np.zeros(cburn.nnuc)
X0[cburn.jc12] = 0.5
X0[cburn.jo16] = 0.5
Y0 = X0/cburn.A
tmax = 1000.0
sol = solve_ivp(cburn.rhs, [0, tmax], Y0, method="BDF", jac=cburn.jacobian,
dense_output=True, args=(rho, T, chugunov_2009), rtol=1.e-6, atol=1.e-10)
Now we run without screening:
[13]:
sol_noscreen = solve_ivp(cburn.rhs, [0, tmax], Y0, method="BDF", jac=cburn.jacobian,
dense_output=True, args=(rho, T), rtol=1.e-6, atol=1.e-10)
and we can plot the two cases together. The non-screened X’s will be shown with a dotted line.
[14]:
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
threshold = 1.e-4
icolor = 0
for i in range(cburn.nnuc):
if (sol.y[i,:]).max() > threshold:
ax.loglog(sol.t, sol.y[i,:] * cburn.A[i],
label=f"X({cburn.names[i].capitalize()})",
color=f"C{icolor}")
ax.loglog(sol_noscreen.t, sol_noscreen.y[i,:] * cburn.A[i],
linestyle=":", color=f"C{icolor}")
icolor += 1
ax.set_ylim(1.e-8, 1.0)
ax.legend(fontsize="small")
ax.set_xlabel("t (s)")
ax.set_ylabel("X")
fig.set_size_inches((8, 6))
As expected, using screening makes the carbon burn much more quickly.